Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ross Rheingans-Yoo's avatar

(this is not a serious comment; I am just here to give Ricki a hard time)

> Each marginal student is more expensive for ... the class as a whole (because it draws from a larger number of people’s attention; as the number of people grows, the marginal additional person is less costly per student but more costly total), so it makes sense to charge them more.

The problem is, none of this cost-to-other-students is reimbursed back to those students. Really, X% of the excess revenue over $850/student should be distributed back as a discount to all students.

I whipped up a quick sheet to demonstrate how this should work in practice: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1epV-LfRr21ApdhGtvdpVkEBaS3FYdMsK72IeVYM4hD4/

Expand full comment
Elliott's avatar

I guess we're trusting you not to fudge the submissions :)

For example, say slots 1-10 are filled, Alice bids 12, then later Bob bids 11. A dishonest organizer might pretend Bob's bid came in first, so that instead of Alice getting slot 11 and Bob being out luck (per the stated algorithm), Bob gets slot 11 and Alice gets slot 12.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts